The Debate Over Sarbanes-Oxley

The Debate Over Sarbanes-OxleyIn true running terms, compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was a demanding dash for [...]

May 1 2005 by Chief Executive


The Debate Over Sarbanes-Oxley
In true running terms, compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was a demanding dash for all involved, but only the first lap in a much longer journey.

Corporate America expended significant resources to meet the recent reporting deadlines in the Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 compliance process. While it proved to be hard work and extremely time-consuming, there is little doubt it will improve the integrity and transparency of financial reporting in the years ahead, thus benefiting the capital markets and shareholders.

For most large companies, this is the first time that such a mass of data has been codified around their financial controls environment, as well as around the processes and systems related to those controls. Many executive teams already are using this information to execute action plans to remediate control deficiencies and are beginning to embed a systematic approach to monitoring compliance and test controls effectiveness.

Armed with their controls “portfolio,” executives now have an in-depth understanding of the nature and effectiveness of their internal controls over financial reporting and the business processes they impact. This knowledge provides corporate leaders with a new lens through which they can evaluate their business€¦quot;a new means of considering and controlling risk, improving the quality of their financial reporting, and driving a return on the Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 compliance investment.

Our experience has shown that focusing on the performance of controls provides the most significant opportunity to help bring efficiencies to the enterprise by identifying key controls over financial reporting, eliminating redundant controls, streamlining the business processes they impact and better managing risk.

For instance, when control activities are manually oriented and “detective,” they tend to be time-consuming, expensive, prone to human error and occur after the fact. That affects business performance and raises total costs. It reveals, in fact, the hidden cost of controls.

Now, through the Section 404 compliance process, companies€¦quot;many for the first time€¦quot;can see the mix of “manual” versus “automated,” and “detective” versus “preventive” controls within their organization. Progressive organizations are replacing the dated processes of the relatively expensive and labor-intensive manual controls to make way for the more automated controls. For example, companies that some years ago installed new ERP systems are finding that those systems have embedded automated controls that had never been activated. Simply turning on the appropriate, embedded ERP controls can improve the controls environment. These are one-time expenses that will yield savings and efficiencies in future years.

In implementing Section 404, organizations must have a dual focus: build sustainable confidence through an ongoing assessment process for compliance; and achieve added value by balancing risk and the cost of controls, while identifying and pursuing business process improvement opportunities.

During each phase of the journey, the organization will seek to use improvements in controls over financial reporting to drive improved business performance. Along the way, the question, “How do we comply with Section 404?” becomes, “How can we use controls as a new lens to support the integrity and value of financial reporting and be a catalyst to improve business processes?”

Timothy P. Flynn
Vice Chair
Audit and Risk Advisory Services
KPMG

Public vs. Private Companies
What a great contrast in your last issue of three deeply related issues: CEO tenure, Sarbox and Bose (January/February 2005). Amar Bose gets to plan products 10 years out, and the CEO of a public company gets to spend time figuring out what arcane financing rule he is in violation of. And, after becoming frustrated because he is spending very little time leading the company, quits. In an informal survey of friends who are CEOs of public companies, they say they now spend up to 50 percent or more of their time on “being public” issues. As a former venture capitalist, public company CEO and private company CEO, your articles are a great reinforcement for my decision never to run a public company again.

I believe we do a disservice when we describe integrity as a value that works only in a setting that enables it. People enable integrity. If you want clarity, rid the organization of the assumption that integrity is situational. We’re either in a state of integrity or we’re not.

Finding scenarios that make it understandable to not have integrity is the beginning of the end of the system. Rationalization begins to precede wisdom and we end up with bankrupt principles. Professor Hooijberg ponders, “What is our integrity worth if our company goes bankrupt?” The answer is if we maintain our integrity, we’re worth a great deal; if we don’t, then we were bankrupt anyway.

Richard Cope
Atlanta Technology Advisors
Norcross, GA

The Dollar, Weak or Strong
I do not agree with your opinion on the current exchange value of the dollar (“In Defense of the Dollar,” January/February 2005). Taking a long-term view, what is happening to the exchange rate is consistent and appropriate with the trade and current account balance.

Over the long term, the market will adjust to the appropriate level to make our imports, exports and assets appropriately valued. Of course, in the short term government intervention can cause major dislocations.

I also disagree with your comment about the yen. The yen was overly weak in the 1980s, suggesting a more competitive Japan than really existed. With its devaluation, Honda, Nissan, Toyota and others decided to move manufacturing to the U.S. creating hundreds of thousands of direct and indirect jobs. Actually, the revaluation of the yen did exactly what it should have done.

Finally, I disagree with your opinion that Americans will buy that BMW at any price. Those with means have the ability to buy what they want because they are smart about their purchases. Those that do not match desire with means are short-term buyers anyway.

Ronald DiLiddo
President
Jiffy-tite Co.
Lancaster, N.Y.

Fixing America’s Schools
I read with great distress the May cover story, “Fixing America’s Future,” especially the chart on page 28, “How American Students Stack Up To Their International Peers.” The chart is irrelevant. The U.S. is basically the only industrialized country that doesn’t have an elite group of centralized national bureaucrats running the country’s education system and forcing many elementary and secondary students on educational tracks that define the rest of their lives€¦quot;France and Japan being the worst examples.

In the U.S., if you drop out of secondary school at 16, you can get a GED at 23, a two-year college degree at 30 and a four-year degree at 38. We’re the only country in the world where you can do that. In other industrialized countries, secondary education may at times be better, but who cares, so long as the “education elite” are afforded opportunities.

You are not alone in not getting it. But why not focus on what is great about the U.S.: It is the closest form of a “results meritocracy” this world has ever seen. Some in the U.S. who have a great deal of formal education€¦quot;professors, for example€¦quot;find it outrageous that a secondary school dropout who owns four gas stations often makes many times more than they do. We Americans will always find a way to become more productive, through whatever training is required€¦quot;and that can occur many years after we leave secondary school.

Ron Giuntini
Executive Director
OEM Product-Services Institute
Lewisburg, Pa

Dates Changed for Korean Summit
The World Information and Communication Technology Summit, scheduled to be held June 9-11 in Seoul, South Korea, has been moved to May 18 and will be held in conjunction with the Seoul Digital Forum, May 19 and 20.

The Ministry of Information and Communication requested the shift in dates to reduce time and travel commitments for American and Western CEOs who are contemplating attending.

MIC Minister Daeje Chin will address the May 18 gathering and meet attendees. Issues to be discussed include:

  • The Future of the Information and Communication Technology Industry and Opportunities in Korea
  • Outsourcing: An Asian Trend
  • 3G and the Future of Mobile Telephony
  • Systems on Chips
  • Digital Media Broadcasting
  • Software Strategies: Proprietary vs. Open Source

Contact Francesca Ross, 212-613-8547
Francesca.ross@firstprotocol.com

 

Chief Executive of the Year 2005 Selection Committee

2004 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE YEAR
Frederick W. Smith
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
FedEx Corporation

Michael J. Critelli
Chairman and Chief Executive
Pitney Bowes, Inc.

Herbert D. Kelleher
Chairman
Southwest Airlines Company

Patricia Russo
Chairman and Chief Executive
Lucent Technologies

Scott Serota
President and Chief Executive
Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Scott Serota
President and Chief Executive
Blue Cross & Blue Shield Association

Joseph M. Tucci
Chief Executive
EMC

Sanford I. Weill
Chairman
Citigroup

 

CONTACT US

CHIEF EXECUTIVE GROUP
110 Summit Ave.
Montvale, NJ 07645

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Address above or email letters@chiefexecutive.net

ADVERTISING & CUSTOM PUBLISHING
201/930-5929 or email advertising@chiefexecutive.net

EVENTS, ROUNDTABLES & CONFERENCES
201/930-5929 or email advertising@chiefexecutive.net
Fax: 201/930-5957

REPRINTS
717/399-1900 x142
emonty@rmsreprints.com

SUBSCRIPTIONS
800/422-2681
circulation@chiefexecutive.net
Foreign or Canadian subscribers 978/256-6480

BACK ISSUES & CUSTOMER SERVICE
201/930-5929 or email circulation@chiefexecutive.net