Editor’s Note: Lior Arussy will be one of the keynote speakers at our upcoming Growth Summit in Nashville, TN, June 9-10. It’ll be two intense days of practical, deploy-it-immediately learning from an amazing array of speakers, led by Domino’s CEO Russell Weiner. Join us >

What is the status of the customer experience discipline in 2026? It depends who you ask. Talk to voice‑of‑customer vendors and you will see packed conferences and full calendars. In that world, CX looks alive and well. Read Forrester’s 2026 predictions, however, and a very different picture emerges.

• CX performance has stagnated for several years, with Forrester’s CX Index showing more brands declining than improving in North America.
• In 2026 some CX teams will rebuild around business value, while many others will lose relevance or be downsized if they stay focused on dashboards and scores.
• A significant share of CX teams is expected to disappear or be radically restructured—not because CX matters less, but because executives no longer see clear ROI.

How can the disparity be so great? And how is it that after more than 25 years of building the CX discipline, it is now in such sharp decline that even its core tool—customer journeys as we know them—is predicted to fade?

Don’t let anyone over‑complicate the answer with a vague “it depends,” and please don’t rush to blame AI. This problem was building long before AI showed up on stage.

The answer lies in a simple truth: Most organizations approached customer experience as a philosophy, not as an operation. They believed in CX as a mindset. They did not run CX as a production process. That’s not a nuance; it is a fundamentally different approach.

In short, customer experience was not operational.

Customer Experience as a Product

Imagine that customer experience were treated as a product in your organization. For any product to get approval to go to market, it must pass several milestones:

• Clear validation—The product must be validated in the marketplace to confirm real demand and to prove that we can design something that creates competitive advantage.
• Designed to win—The product is intentionally designed to win customers’ attention and wallets, with a simplified experience and clear “wow” factors that make it stand out.
• Delivered consistently—The product must be produced at high quality, consistently. The production line is aligned to defined standards so customers reliably receive what they were promised.
• Successfully profitable—The product’s success is tracked, its profitability monitored and its contribution to the company’s overall results managed carefully.
• Evolving—Over time, the product is refreshed and redesigned to stay relevant to ever‑changing customer expectations.
• Failure is not an option—Winning in the marketplace is mandatory; if the product cannot compete, it is discontinued and replaced.

All of these guidelines are standard for operational initiatives. Design, delivery, success tracking and ongoing relevance are critical and non‑negotiable.

Philosophical initiatives are treated differently. When it comes to “mindset” aspirations such as excellence, exceptional performance, thinking outside the box or humanity, we often leave them as posters on the wall, open to personal interpretation. Philosophical initiatives are rarely subjected to the same rigor as operational initiatives. As a result, they fade over time and are treated as a “nice to have” rather than a “must have.”

How Did We Get Here?

CX failed to deliver on its promised results partly because it was framed as a philosophical initiative instead of an operational one—but it doesn’t stop there. Several additional factors pushed the discipline into its current disappointing state.

This list should serve as a cautionary tale for leaders who still believe in CX as a true growth engine and want to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

• Opaque vision of the future. In many CX programs, the end state was vague. Every sales team can recite its annual targets in hard numbers. CX leaders rarely could. They chased a dream best summarized as “I’ll know it when I see it.” That is not enough to guide people toward a future state.
• Cheerleaders, not operational leaders. Many CX leaders were appointed as internal cheerleaders and lacked real operational experience. Among today’s CX “gurus” you will find outstanding podcasters, but not always leaders with a proven execution track record. The real game is played on the field, not on the sidelines. CX deserves players, not cheerleaders.
• No transformation experience. True CX is a transformation: a shift from one way of operating to another. Even when operational leaders were given the CX mandate, many had never led internal change. They settled for small, cosmetic tweaks and failed to elevate CX into a true differentiator and growth driver.
• Soft measurements. Companies are ultimately measured on revenue and profit. Everything else is a soft metric. Voice‑of‑customer providers tried to convince executives otherwise, but they themselves rarely drove the hard outcomes. If they had, they would have anchored their story in hard numbers, not only soft scores. Is VOC important? Yes, but its influence is shrinking, because it largely failed to drive the changes customers were asking for. Fatigue set in.
• Event, not lifestyle. In many organizations, CX was treated as an event, not a new way of doing business. After the offsite and the inspiring stories, everyone went back to business as usual. People enjoyed the event, and then it ended—just like any other.
• No investment in people. Without investment in employee empowerment, CX cannot take off. Human, personalized, authentic experiences require employees who actually care. Caring is a personal choice; you cannot order it by memo. Investing in employees can be costly. But if you think that is expensive, try higher attrition and margin erosion. Those costs are far higher.
• No real process and behavior change. Which processes actually changed? Which greedy policies were eliminated? Without tangible changes to policies, processes and behaviors, you don’t have a CX strategy; you have an unfulfilled CX promise. Too often the changes were so minor they simply didn’t matter.

Making these mistakes was easy. If CX is a philosophical pursuit, not an operational one, then none of this looks like a mistake at all—it looks like the path.

The One Operational Word Here Is “Operation”

The defining word in customer experience success is “operational.” Once you commit to a truly customer‑centric operation, the path you chart will be very different from the one that led you to today’s disappointing results.

The idea of treating customer experience as a product may provide a new frame of reference and with it a new way to thinking, designing and delivering customer experience. Not one that is just hopefully desired but rather one that absolutely positively must happen!