Does Your Board Have A Culture Where Honest Debate Takes Place?

Directors need to feel that what’s best for investors is decided on the merits of actual ideas, not personal alliances to the CEO. Sometimes that’s more difficult than it appears.

Corporate directors at Cano Health recently had a dispute that prompted three directors to resign from the board and vow to wage a campaign to potentially oust the company CEO and management. While this level of public feuding between directors may be rare, it raises the question: What should corporate board members do when there are stark differences of opinion about management’s business strategy? Does your board have a culture where healthy, honest debate can take place? Is it better to resign quietly or debate with other directors and management publicly? Are we likely to see more public disagreements between directors at a time when boards are scrutinized more heavily than ever before?

Most of the time, directors resign discreetly if they feel very strongly that their company is going in a direction they cannot endorse. However, even when directors do resign quietly, intense discussions about governance issues and business strategy may have taken place behind closed doors. Unfortunately, as more boards are being sued for oversight violations and breaches of fiduciary duty, a greater number of directors may decide to resign their positions or take the more serious step of publicly clashing with the CEO and other board members to highlight governance lapses. These directors may hope that such actions could help the company avoid disaster and help them avoid personal liability if the company is ever sued.

In the case of Cano Health, board members Barry Sternlicht, CEO of Starwood Capital Group, Elliot Cooperstone, founder and managing partner of private equity firm InTandem Capital Partners, and Lewis Gold co-founder and chairman of the board at behavioral health company Advanced Recovery Systems, resigned their positions and banded together “to pursue change” at the company. In an SEC 13-D filing,they claimed they would seek changes “including, but not limited to, the replacement of the CEO, sale of non-core assets and enhancement of shareholder value.”

In a press release announcing his resignation, Sternlicht, who personally invested $50 million in the company in 2021, stated that he was “extremely troubled by the poor operating decisions and performance, by what I consider the opacity and obfuscation of information furnished to the Board, and by the inability to forecast the Company’s financial performance over which [CEO Marlow Hernandez] and his management team have presided. These factors have caused the Company’s stock price to be decimated, dropping over 90% from its debut, and the Company is now saddled with a crippling debt burden.”

Cano health issued a statement of its own addressing the resignation of the three directors, stating, “We are disappointed that three directors chose to resign due to what we believe is their focus solely on the short term. We strongly disagree with their representations about the Company and their assessment of Dr. Hernandez’s performance.”

The statement went on to say, “Boards must have healthy debate about how best to drive shareholder value, including in difficult circumstances. It is irresponsible to air those debates in ways that are meant to undermine healthy Board debate and harm the Company and shareholders.”

No matter which side you agree with, Cano Health now has an unfortunate public situation that must be cleaned up. The challenge for boards is to create an environment where healthy debate can honestly take place. Board members must feel that what’s best for investors and the company is decided on the merits of actual ideas, not personal alliances to the CEO or other directors. Sometimes that’s more difficult than it might appear. If an environment for honest and safe debate doesn’t exist on a board and multiple board members leave at the same time, the public disclosure of the defections will create a statement that alerts the financial markets. Investors and regulators may want answers. It is important for companies to periodically re-evaluate how their board deals with honest, healthy debate in the boardroom.

As recession fears loom, and ESG issues become a higher priority for boards, directors will be under tremendous pressure to make operating decisions that keep companies profitable in turbulent times. Board members will have various opinions on what companies should do based on ever-changing economic and political environments. Companies that make bad decisions will likely see directors leave and CEOs replaced. Expect to see more directors speak out publicly about executive decisions they believe place companies at major risk – especially if those decisions can’t be debated internally.

The bad news is that publicly raising issues about conflicts between the board and management over governance policies can hurt a company’s stock price and raise cause for concern among regulators and shareholders. However, the good news is that once the governance issues are illuminated, the company will be forced to address the problems and the company should be better for it, and ultimately the shareholders will benefit too.


  • Get the CEO Briefing

    Sign up today to get weekly access to the latest issues affecting CEOs in every industry
  • upcoming events


    Strategic Planning Workshop

    1:00 - 5:00 pm

    We are in a period of rapid change. Customer needs, technologies, competitors and internal capabilities require companies to review and update their strategies for the new realities. In this workshop, strategy experts Steve Rutan and Denise Harrison will show you a systematic approach to strategic planning to help you refine or redefine your business strategy and approach including:

    • Learn what you need to know to develop an effective strategic plan. Put the right players on the strategic planning team.
    • Develop strategies that leverage your company’s unique position in the marketplace. Lift your management team beyond “business as usual” thought processes and activities.
    • Translate your strategies into action. Achieve your vision for success and generate superior financial results.
    • Identify exactly what you need to do now to position your company for future success.

    To sign up, select this option in your registration form. Additional fee of $695 will be added to your total.

    New York, NY: ​​​Chief Executive's Corporate Citizenship Awards 2017

    Women in Leadership Seminar and Peer Discussion

    2:00 - 5:00 pm

    Female leaders face the same issues all leaders do, but they often face additional challenges too. In this peer session, we will facilitate a discussion of best practices and how to overcome common barriers to help women leaders be more effective within and outside their organizations. 

    Limited space available.

    To sign up, select this option in your registration form. Additional fee of $495 will be added to your total.

    Golf Outing

    10:30 - 5:00 pm
    General’s Retreat at Hermitage Golf Course
    Sponsored by UBS

    General’s Retreat, built in 1986 with architect Gary Roger Baird, has been voted the “Best Golf Course in Nashville” and is a “must play” when visiting the Nashville, Tennessee area. With the beautiful setting along the Cumberland River, golfers of all capabilities will thoroughly enjoy the golf, scenery and hospitality.

    The golf outing fee includes transportation to and from the hotel, greens/cart fees, use of practice facilities, and boxed lunch. The bus will leave the hotel at 10:30 am for a noon shotgun start and return to the hotel after the cocktail reception following the completion of the round.

    To sign up, select this option in your registration form. Additional fee of $295 will be added to your total.