Mixed Reactions from the Manufacturing Industry on President’s Budget Proposal

Judging from initial reactions from top trade groups, manufacturers are of two minds concerning the President’s proposed budget. The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) scorns the tax increases saying it blocks growth, but likes some of the other provisions. The Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM), on the other hand, sees the prospect for wider tax reform and some benefits to manufacturers in proposals for infrastructure spending.

March 10 2014 by ChiefExecutive.net


The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) released a critical response to the President’s recent budget proposal. The statement, from Aric Newhouse, Senior Vice President of Policy and Government Relations, opened:

“The President’s budget delivers damaging tax increases for manufacturers in every industry sector, from small manufacturers to global companies. In addition, this budget, like previous incarnations, takes aim at energy producers with provisions that would only increase energy costs in the United States and significantly undermine our potential for growth.”

The statement then concedes some provisions that would benefit manufacturers, including a permanent research and development credit and the opening of manufacturing hubs across the country. Newhouse also praised the President’s commitment to transportation and infrastructure funding, and his emphasis on workforce development. “Unfortunately,” he says, “these pro-growth proposals find themselves in the shadow of job-killing tax increases.”

The Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM) has also released a cursory review of the budget, with significantly more praise. They noted the focus on advanced manufacturing, which is good for business, but maybe not so with voter perception. To implement this advanced manufacturing agenda, Obama has zeroed in on several key areas: workforce development, infrastructure investment, and tax reform.

AAM praised the President’s workforce development programs, including a government-wide reorganization of STEM education programs and a “Community College Job-Driven Training Fund” through the Department of Labor. They also support the $302 billion investment in infrastructure, as funded through tax reform.

The proposed budget also includes a $27.9 billion budget for the Energy Department, an increase of 2.6 percent over the fiscal year 2014 enacted level. Notable plans include increased investment in clean-energy technologies as part of Obama’s all-of-the-above energy strategy and investments in energy grid research and development.

How do we get what we want?

Republicans are right — this budget is definitely an election-year tool, but is anyone surprised? Not at all.

It is surprising, however, to see two major manufacturing organizations on opposite sides of the fence. They agree with the program proposals — workforce development, manufacturing hubs, infrastructure investments — but not the means to these ends.

As the budgeting process moves forward, the proposed tax increases that are so offensive to the NAM will certainly be dramatically reduced. And as these increases get slashed, so does the available funding for the manufacturing programs they so highly praised.


Read: http://www.nam.org/Communications/Articles/2014/03/Tax-Increases-in-Presidents-Budget-Block-Growth.aspx

Read: http://americanmanufacturing.org/blog/first-look-presidents-budget-proposal-2015