R&D: In-house vs. Outsourcing—Making the Right Product Development Decision

Manufacturers are constantly looking at new technologies to improve processes, cut costs and expand the breadth and depth of products they provide to customers. But how do you decide on the best way to get access to the needed technology?

Picture this scenario. The sales team tells you that eight of 10 customers are asking for X product. That’s something you know you should be able to make, and you think you can, but there are some holes in your capabilities. Filling those holes requires expanding your technology in one or two process areas.

“Having everything developed by your in-house R&D department risks speed to market and dramatically increases risk of completion.”

Or perhaps it’s a material you’ve never worked with or even an entirely new product you’re going to have to figure out how to make. Now it becomes an R&D problem to create it within certain management directives. For example, “we’re only going to be able to sell it for Y dollars, so don’t come back with something that costs double that to produce.”

Many companies have traditionally approached this problem the same way: by turning to their in-house R&D team and tasking them with developing the needed product, process, or component. But that’s not always the optimal solution. Sometimes, outsourcing to a third party under contract, or accessing the needed technology via licensing from someone who already has the expertise in the area you are seeking and may only be using it in a non-competitive way, can provide a quicker, more cost-effective solution, and perhaps do so with less risk to ultimate success. The best approach needs to be considered by management on a case-by-case basis, balancing each of these factors.

Let’s look at each of these options separately:


  • Get the CEO Briefing

    Sign up today to get weekly access to the latest issues affecting CEOs in every industry
  • upcoming events