“In these companies, executives behave in a way very consistent with significant consumption of private benefits of control,” said Vyacheslav Fos, a professor at the University of Illinois and co-author of the study. “Executives act as if their private benefit of shares is higher than the market price. They are trying to defend themselves. This is what our study shows.”
Managers and their legal champions often claim to oppose activist shareholders on grounds activists are out for short-term gain, while the managers support long-term value. There is a lot of evidence activist attacks change companies for the better, bringing measurable operational and financial benefits. The new research shows how high a price executives are willing to pay to retain their power to resist such changes, which unsurprisingly may involve a change in management.
Read more: The Wall Street Journal
Aprio CEO Richard Kopelman on 14 deals in a year, a $300 million AI bet…
Though volatile pressure continues to temper current business forecasts in the sector, year-ahead manufacturing confidence…
In an era of tariffs, China, AI, margin pressure and continued economic uncertainty the best…
Once you commit to a truly customer-centric operation, the path you chart will be very…
After a decade, we’ve found that distributed teams outperform when the operating infrastructure is right.
Leadership turnover creates uncertainty fast, especially when employees lose sight of the company’s core values.…