CEOs are Holding Back on Funding Business Investments, Some Say

The consistently sluggish expansion of the nation’s GDP, which slowed in the second quarter to an annual rate of only 1.2%, can be largely blamed on consistently disappointing levels of business spending on new factories, equipment and software, which has subtracted from growth for three straight quarters. While consumer spending rose at 4.2% in the second quarter, business investment actually fell at a 2.2% pace.

Many CEOs will blame their unwillingness to make new business investment on an Obama administration they say is hostile to corporate America, as demonstrated by its attitude on taxes and the ever-growing spate of business regulations.

“Uncertainty over the most contentious presidential election in decades also unnerves CEOs who want predictability above all else as they make investment decisions.”

However, uncertainty over the most contentious presidential election in decades also unnerves CEOs who want predictability above all else as they make investment decisions. But business leaders’ trepidations go far beyond the election result, some observers insist.

Moreover, tepid business investment is, in large part, being blamed for the longest slide in American worker productivity since the late 1970s, a development that is plaguing prospects for long-term growth. Investment in new plants and machine tools, new computer systems and other technologies could help boost worker efficiency, but hasn’t been available.

Meanwhile, another important input to the production process—labor—is becoming increasingly scarce and more expensive, as Bloomberg noted.

Other factors are at work, too, including slack global demand, as even the anemic U.S. economy has become the most consistently reliable engine of economic growth anywhere in the world. Slowing in China, stasis in Europe, and troubles in Brazil all cut into foreign demand for American goods and services.

“The logic is quite simple: the corporate sector is unlikely to increase investment in the absence of strong (global) final demand,” Deutsche Bank analyst Dominic Konstam wrote recently.
Whatever its exact elements, this toxic brew of factors has been a recipe for disaster for U.S. business investment. It’ll be up to CEOs to decide whether to change it.

Dale Buss

Dale Buss is a long-time contributor to Chief Executive, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and other business publications. He lives in Michigan.

Share
Published by
Dale Buss

Recent Posts

Leading In The Age Of AI Agents

A human-AI workforce doesn’t eliminate the need for strong leadership—it transforms it. Here’s how to…

6 hours ago

From $1,300 Startup To Behavior-Change Powerhouse

Through behavioral science, data-driven creativity and a culture that champions female leadership, Tim Berney and…

8 hours ago

The C-Suite Superpower You’re Most Likely Missing

As leadership visibility and social influence become core business skills, a dedicated executive communicator turns…

1 day ago

Weakening Dollar: 5 Essential Questions CEOs Should Ask

Most American companies still treat currency as a finance issue. Treasury hedges it. Accounting reports…

1 day ago

That High Stakes Meeting Isn’t A Threat—It’s A Challenge

Changing your mindset can't change the situation, but it can drastically change the outcome. A…

1 day ago

CEO Confidence Flat In February Poll Amid Hopes For More Stability

After a shaky start to the year, CEO optimism is buoyed by steady demand and…

3 days ago