CEOs are Holding Back on Funding Business Investments, Some Say

The consistently sluggish expansion of the nation’s GDP, which slowed in the second quarter to an annual rate of only 1.2%, can be largely blamed on consistently disappointing levels of business spending on new factories, equipment and software, which has subtracted from growth for three straight quarters. While consumer spending rose at 4.2% in the second quarter, business investment actually fell at a 2.2% pace.

Many CEOs will blame their unwillingness to make new business investment on an Obama administration they say is hostile to corporate America, as demonstrated by its attitude on taxes and the ever-growing spate of business regulations.

“Uncertainty over the most contentious presidential election in decades also unnerves CEOs who want predictability above all else as they make investment decisions.”

However, uncertainty over the most contentious presidential election in decades also unnerves CEOs who want predictability above all else as they make investment decisions. But business leaders’ trepidations go far beyond the election result, some observers insist.

Moreover, tepid business investment is, in large part, being blamed for the longest slide in American worker productivity since the late 1970s, a development that is plaguing prospects for long-term growth. Investment in new plants and machine tools, new computer systems and other technologies could help boost worker efficiency, but hasn’t been available.

Meanwhile, another important input to the production process—labor—is becoming increasingly scarce and more expensive, as Bloomberg noted.

Other factors are at work, too, including slack global demand, as even the anemic U.S. economy has become the most consistently reliable engine of economic growth anywhere in the world. Slowing in China, stasis in Europe, and troubles in Brazil all cut into foreign demand for American goods and services.

“The logic is quite simple: the corporate sector is unlikely to increase investment in the absence of strong (global) final demand,” Deutsche Bank analyst Dominic Konstam wrote recently.
Whatever its exact elements, this toxic brew of factors has been a recipe for disaster for U.S. business investment. It’ll be up to CEOs to decide whether to change it.

Dale Buss

Dale Buss is a long-time contributor to Chief Executive, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and other business publications. He lives in Michigan.

Share
Published by
Dale Buss

Recent Posts

AI Will Only Replace White-Collar Jobs If We Forget What Makes Us Human

The leaders who matter most in the age of AI will be the ones who,…

2 days ago

Amid Growing Economic Uncertainty, Mid-Level Managers Winning The Pay Battle 

When it comes to pay in 2026, our latest survey finds division heads and supervisors…

3 days ago

Growth Without Heroics: Building A System That Scales

The companies that scale consistently are not the ones with the most heroic individual performers.…

3 days ago

Shane Battier Knows Success Comes From Studying Your Opponent

The two-time NBA champion has taken the lessons he learned on the court and brought…

5 days ago

Five Growth Disciplines Midsize Manufacturers Can Borrow From Collars & Co.

How this Shark Tank–winner apparel startup is forcing founder Justin Baer to make fast, high‑stakes…

5 days ago

The Modern CEO Is Now A Media Platform

Corporate leadership is entering a new era of transparency. These guidelines can help leaders thoughtfully…

5 days ago