CEOs are Holding Back on Funding Business Investments, Some Say

The consistently sluggish expansion of the nation’s GDP, which slowed in the second quarter to an annual rate of only 1.2%, can be largely blamed on consistently disappointing levels of business spending on new factories, equipment and software, which has subtracted from growth for three straight quarters. While consumer spending rose at 4.2% in the second quarter, business investment actually fell at a 2.2% pace.

Many CEOs will blame their unwillingness to make new business investment on an Obama administration they say is hostile to corporate America, as demonstrated by its attitude on taxes and the ever-growing spate of business regulations.

“Uncertainty over the most contentious presidential election in decades also unnerves CEOs who want predictability above all else as they make investment decisions.”

However, uncertainty over the most contentious presidential election in decades also unnerves CEOs who want predictability above all else as they make investment decisions. But business leaders’ trepidations go far beyond the election result, some observers insist.

Moreover, tepid business investment is, in large part, being blamed for the longest slide in American worker productivity since the late 1970s, a development that is plaguing prospects for long-term growth. Investment in new plants and machine tools, new computer systems and other technologies could help boost worker efficiency, but hasn’t been available.

Meanwhile, another important input to the production process—labor—is becoming increasingly scarce and more expensive, as Bloomberg noted.

Other factors are at work, too, including slack global demand, as even the anemic U.S. economy has become the most consistently reliable engine of economic growth anywhere in the world. Slowing in China, stasis in Europe, and troubles in Brazil all cut into foreign demand for American goods and services.

“The logic is quite simple: the corporate sector is unlikely to increase investment in the absence of strong (global) final demand,” Deutsche Bank analyst Dominic Konstam wrote recently.
Whatever its exact elements, this toxic brew of factors has been a recipe for disaster for U.S. business investment. It’ll be up to CEOs to decide whether to change it.

Dale Buss

Dale Buss is a long-time contributor to Chief Executive, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and other business publications. He lives in Michigan.

Share
Published by
Dale Buss

Recent Posts

The $2.8 Billion Email: What CEOs Get Wrong About BEC Fraud

Business Email Compromise scams are rising fast and they’re not just an IT problem—they’re a…

18 hours ago

Preparing For Uncertainty Without Slowing Progress

Uncertainty today feels more potent than ever. But manufacturers already have all the tools required…

1 day ago

Calero CRO Eric Martorano Knows Stories Can Be Our Most Powerful Tool

Calero, argues that data informs but stories drive action—making narrative clarity a core leadership skill…

3 days ago

The 3 Lessons Of Tim Cook

There are many, of course, from the Apple CEO, who just announced he is stepping…

3 days ago

An Autism Diagnosis At 55 Reframed This CEO’s Entire Life

From naval combat to building companies, his remarkable ability to remain calm wasn’t coldness or…

4 days ago

Raising The Bar: A More Disciplined Way To Hire Senior Leaders

Without a forward-looking lens, even a well-run process can produce the wrong outcome.

7 days ago