Drive your strategic HR advantage by attending the CEO Talent Summit
October 13th and 14th, 2016, Cincinnati, Ohio
This year’s CEO Talent Summit gives you direct access to peers dealing with and solving the same talent challenges you face. Learn how they implement everything from groundbreaking recruiting and retention strategies to world-class training programs and new technology to adapt to a changing workforce. Find out more at www.ceotalentsummit.com.
What is clear, however, is that companies are required to make that distinction and to offer employees statutorily required benefits and to pay the required employment taxes. Those who make a mistake in employment classification risk confronting significant liability under tax law and wage and hour regulations, as well as other employment laws like OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Act) and FMLA (Family and Medical Leave Act). A wide range of penalties may be imposed and there’s even the possibility of benefit plan disqualification.
While various courts and government agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service offer lists of factors to help companies narrow the interpretation, even these differ slightly from court to court and agency to agency. Not surprisingly, according to a study by Deloitte, only 19% of executives believe their businesses fully understand the labor and employment laws that govern contingent workers.
The most important aspect in determining if a worker is full-time, part-time or contingent for legal purposes is control. “Who controls the where, when and how of a particular task—the employer or the worker?” explains Nicholas Woodfield, principal and general counsel of The Employment Law Group, a law firm representing people with legal claims against employers, who cites restaurant and retail workers as an example. “If these people must keep strict hours in a particular location, and must dress and act in very specific ways, then no matter how you cut it, they will almost certainly be considered employees and not independent contractors.”
The upshot for employers is to proceed cautiously. “You can’t just decide to call someone an ‘independent contractor,’” warns Woodfield. “And it’s not enough to agree with a worker that he or she will be treated as an independent contractor. This isn’t something that either party can settle purely between themselves. An ‘independent contractor’ is a legal term that either applies to a situation or does not apply.”
To ensure the status of an independent contractor from a regulatory standpoint, employers must be ready and willing to relinquish control, insofar as how these people dress, what tools they use, how long they work and who else they might do work for. “The more rules you want to set, the less likely you’ll have an independent contractor,” Woodfield warns.
The bottom line? Employers looking to leverage the gig economy should play it safe. “If you’re not sure whether it’s okay to treat someone as an independent contractor, ask an attorney for advice,” says Woodfield. “If the attorney isn’t sure, just treat the worker as an employee. Any other decision is asking for trouble.”
This article was excerpted from a piece scheduled to run in the November/December 2016 issue of Chief Executive magazine.
You might also like:
The Results-Only Work Environment: How it Benefits More Than Just Millennials
Reinventing Yourself: How to Stay Relevant—and Keep Your Job
Are You a Superboss? Here’s How to Tell
How One State Works to Match Talent with Industry Need
Survey: CEOs are Actively Involved in Talent Strategies, but Have Trouble Finding Talent
5 Steps to Help You Trim Your Turnover