Is Your Contractor Really an Employee?


Drive your strategic HR advantage by attending the CEO Talent Summit
October 13th and 14th, 2016, Cincinnati, Ohio
This year’s CEO Talent Summit gives you direct access to peers dealing with and solving the same talent challenges you face. Learn how they implement everything from groundbreaking recruiting and retention strategies to world-class training programs and new technology to adapt to a changing workforce. Find out more at www.ceotalentsummit.com.


What, exactly, constitutes an independent contractor depends on who you ask. The Fair Labor Standards Act does not define the specific differences between full-time employment, part-time workers and independent contractors. What’s more, the Labor Department’s website notes that the National Labor Relations Board, the Civil Rights Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act—each major labor and employment statute, in fact—“has its own way of drawing the line between employees and independent contractors.” Many of these definitions appear quite similar, but were created over a period of a half-century. Thus, their language is often “vague or circular,” the department concedes, “leaving them open to a broad range of interpretations.”

What is clear, however, is that companies are required to make that distinction and to offer employees statutorily required benefits and to pay the required employment taxes. Those who make a mistake in employment classification risk confronting significant liability under tax law and wage and hour regulations, as well as other employment laws like OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Act) and FMLA (Family and Medical Leave Act). A wide range of penalties may be imposed and there’s even the possibility of benefit plan disqualification.

While various courts and government agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service offer lists of factors to help companies narrow the interpretation, even these differ slightly from court to court and agency to agency. Not surprisingly, according to a study by Deloitte, only 19% of executives believe their businesses fully understand the labor and employment laws that govern contingent workers.

“19% of executives believe their businesses fully understand the labor and employment laws that govern contingent workers.”

The most important aspect in determining if a worker is full-time, part-time or contingent for legal purposes is control. “Who controls the where, when and how of a particular task—the employer or the worker?” explains Nicholas Woodfield, principal and general counsel of The Employment Law Group, a law firm representing people with legal claims against employers, who cites restaurant and retail workers as an example. “If these people must keep strict hours in a particular location, and must dress and act in very specific ways, then no matter how you cut it, they will almost certainly be considered employees and not independent contractors.”

The upshot for employers is to proceed cautiously. “You can’t just decide to call someone an ‘independent contractor,’” warns Woodfield. “And it’s not enough to agree with a worker that he or she will be treated as an independent contractor. This isn’t something that either party can settle purely between themselves. An ‘independent contractor’ is a legal term that either applies to a situation or does not apply.”

To ensure the status of an independent contractor from a regulatory standpoint, employers must be ready and willing to relinquish control, insofar as how these people dress, what tools they use, how long they work and who else they might do work for. “The more rules you want to set, the less likely you’ll have an independent contractor,” Woodfield warns.

The bottom line? Employers looking to leverage the gig economy should play it safe. “If you’re not sure whether it’s okay to treat someone as an independent contractor, ask an attorney for advice,” says Woodfield. “If the attorney isn’t sure, just treat the worker as an employee. Any other decision is asking for trouble.”

This article was excerpted from a piece scheduled to run in the November/December 2016 issue of Chief Executive magazine.

You might also like:
The Results-Only Work Environment: How it Benefits More Than Just Millennials
Reinventing Yourself: How to Stay Relevant—and Keep Your Job
Are You a Superboss? Here’s How to Tell
How One State Works to Match Talent with Industry Need
Survey: CEOs are Actively Involved in Talent Strategies, but Have Trouble Finding Talent
5 Steps to Help You Trim Your Turnover


Russ Banham

Russ Banham (russ@russbanham.com) is a contributing writer to Chief Executive

Share
Published by
Russ Banham

Recent Posts

AOL’s Steve Case On The Key Difference Between A Founder And CEO

In this edition of our Corporate Competitor Podcast, leadership speaker and storytelling expert Don Yaeger…

9 hours ago

Chase The Unreasonable To Reimagine The Future

Being able to reconfigure our business model often means being willing to blow up something…

9 hours ago

Best & Worst States for Business 2024 Survey Finds Unsettled CEOs Ready To Roam

Latest Chief Executive survey of Best & Worst States for Business demonstrates upward mobility is…

1 day ago

Best & Worst States: CEO Poll Finds 49% ‘More Open’ To New Locations Than A Year Ago

Our 2024 Best & Worst States for business survey finds chief executives settling into new…

1 day ago

Best & Worst States: ‘Mr. Wonderful’ Is Now Endorsing Entire States, Not Just Startups

Shark Tank celebrity investor O’Leary really loves Oklahoma and other 'flyover' states while training specific…

1 day ago

Best & Worst States: How An Office Megacenter Is Adjusting To New Realities

Arlington County, Virginia, takes creative and multipronged approach to cutting its high office-vacancy rate.

1 day ago