CEOs in the News

The Danger of Trump Overplaying His Hand

Maybe so, but close observers are concerned that what started as a publicity move to shame Carrier Corp. from closing its HVAC facility in Indiana and setting up operations in Mexico has become a worrisome trend. Today many U.S. companies—even mid-market firms—have operations abroad. Any CEO who is considering shifting production has to anticipate the public consequences any such move would entail.

Does Donald Trump think he can shame every CEO who is thinking of transferring operations to Mexico, or is he merely picking a select list of high-profile American companies to signal the remaining companies to rethink their outsourcing? If so, it is a clever ruse, but one that could backfire if tried too many times. For starters, the threat of a “big border tax” over Ford or GM’s car production in Mexico cannot be executed by executive order.

“Trump will need Congress to agree to such a move and that could set up a fight that would clearly distract from other more important items on his agenda.

Trump will need Congress to agree to such a move and that could set up a fight that would clearly distract from other more important items on his agenda, such as repealing and replacing Obamacare and immigration reform. Trump is shrewd enough to know that he will need to pick his battles carefully.

Stuart Pearson, an auto analyst at Exane BNP Paribas, told the Financial Times, “the question now is whether this move by Ford is a sufficient win for Trump to ease the risk to imposing tariffs on Mexican imports.” U.S. manufacturing CEOs clearly got the message that there’s a new sheriff in town.

But there is a risk that such moves could degenerate into mere bullying. It only needs one CEO to push back, claiming that honest management requires independent decision-making, and that interference from a busybody president is counterproductive. Carlos Ghosn, CEO of Renault-Nissan, a company that produces much of its U.S. bound vehicles in Mexico, already has called for Trump to make explicit his policy on production repatriation.

For example, some forms of offshoring production add to the process innovation of domestic producers. Foreclosing such moves in certain cases can actually hurt domestic employment owing to complex supply chains. If Trump is as clever as he thinks, he will back off until his plans for tax reform and repealing counterproductive regulation can be set before congress, giving business leaders a more solid reason to rethink investment decisions.

J.P. Donlon

J.P. Donlon is Editor Emeritus of Chief Executive magazine.

Share
Published by
J.P. Donlon

Recent Posts

Don Yaeger’s The Film Room: 5 Ways To Make Your Processes More Efficient

The leaders who win consistently are those who sweat details, design for loyalty and experience…

7 hours ago

Playbook: Successful Corporate Transformations

More than a third of large organizations are undergoing business transformations at any given time,…

1 day ago

5 Coaching Conversations Every New Manager Needs

In the first 90 days, the right conversations matter more than most new managers realize—and…

1 day ago

Motorola Solutions’ Greg Brown Is Chief Executive Magazine’s 2026 CEO Of The Year

A committee of his peer CEOs recognized Brown for transforming a once-struggling cellular handset manufacturer…

1 day ago

Ram Charan: A Manufacturing Playbook For A Turbulent New Era

The bestselling author and advisor to CEOs shares what he’s counseling manufacturers as they navigate…

3 days ago

AI Adoption Is Outpacing Operational Readiness And CEOs Will Pay

Rising investment. Unclear outcomes. Increasing scrutiny on the executives responsible for both. The risk isn’t…

4 days ago