In 1979, Harvard Business Review published “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy” by a young economist and associate professor, Michael E. Porter. It was his first HBR article, and it started a revolution in the strategy field. In subsequent decades, Porter has brought his signature economic rigor to the study of competitive strategy for corporations, regions, nations, and, more recently, health care and philanthropy.
In essence, the job of the strategist is to understand and cope with competition. Often, however, managers define competition too narrowly, as if it occurred only among today’s direct competitors. Yet competition for profits goes beyond established industry rivals to include four other competitive forces as well: customers, suppliers, potential entrants, and substitute products. The extended rivalry that results from all five forces defines an industry’s structure and shapes the nature of competitive interaction within an industry.
As different from one another as industries might appear on the surface, the underlying drivers of profitability are the same. The global auto industry, for instance, appears to have nothing in common with the worldwide market for art masterpieces or the heavily regulated health-care delivery industry in Europe. But to understand industry competition and profitability in each of those three cases, one must analyze the industry’s underlying structure in terms of the five forces. (See the exhibit “The Five Forces That Shape Industry Competition.”)
Read more: Harvard Business Review
According to Gallagher, mentorship starts with curiosity: 'Get to know people, be present. This is…
From weekly war-room meetings to testifying in D.C., Julie Robbins has spent the past year…
Despite stressors associated with heightened global risk mounting since early 2026, U.S. manufacturers express increased…
Most entrepreneurs expect uncertainty to fade as their businesses succeed. More revenue, more experience, more…
What CEOs don’t know about their own financials—and what it’s costing them.
How short-term leadership relief turns into high-interest debt.