Is the Export-Import Bank’s Demise Starting to Hurt Mid-Market Exporters?

There are growing indications that mid-market exporters are joining Boeing and GE in considering paring domestic manufacturing because the agency no longer is available to ensure access to competitive export financing that private banks can’t or won’t offer.

ProGauge Technologies, in Bakersfield, Calif., for instance, is bidding on a project that could lead to 30 new jobs, but only five are staying in the U.S., according to U.S. News & World Report. “It’s pretty sad not to be able to keep the jobs here” because he couldn’t count on Ex-Im Bank aid, ProGauge president Don Nelson told the magazine.

“The lack of financing for small and midsized companies wanting to export “is a real question for those who think the Ex-Im Bank shouldn’t continue.”

In a similar vein, earlier this month, mid-market satellite manufacturer Orbital ATK became the second company to lose business because Congress didn’t renew the Ex-Im Bank’s authorization, according to the magazine. Senior Director Ted McFarland said that his Virginia-based company lost a bid for the Azerspace-2 satellite with the government of Azerbaijan because it couldn’t provide export-credit financing, so a foreign competitor won the deal.

The lack of financing for small and midsized companies wanting to export “is a real question for those who think the Ex-Im Bank shouldn’t continue,” Gordon Mills, former administrator of the Small Business Administration and a senior fellow at Harvard Business School, told the Wall Street Journal, “because small businesses really require lots and lots of those services. At the moment, there is no other alternative.”

Ex-Im Bank advocates for the mid-market also have noted that nearly 90% of the bank’s deals last year totaling more than $5 billion in financing and insurance directly served small companies.

Still, so far, instrumental conservative members of the House haven’t backed down from their contention that the Ex-Im Bank serves mainly as a slush fund for big companies that don’t need to be taking advantage of taxpayer-guaranteed funds. They assert that this fount of “corporate welfare” has put other U.S. companies at a competitive disadvantage and distorts export markets, and that the bank’s assistance hasn’t been a crucial adjunct to private capital in the vast majority of instances.

Dale Buss

Dale Buss is a long-time contributor to Chief Executive, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and other business publications. He lives in Michigan.

Share
Published by
Dale Buss

Recent Posts

Market Engineering Drives Market Leadership: Why Tesla Is Outpacing GM In The Age Of Narrative Advantage

Market engineering is far more than clever marketing. It’s the operating system for category ownership…

5 hours ago

AI Adoption Is Outpacing Operational Readiness And CEOs Will Pay

Rising investment. Unclear outcomes. Increasing scrutiny on the executives responsible for both. The risk isn’t…

10 hours ago

Sonnenfeld: How To Survive Today’s Politics

In a populist moment for America, standing your ground is the only strategy.

12 hours ago

Lessons From Higher Education On Leading Through Uncertainty

A useful model for how organizations in all sectors can lead responsibly when certainty disappears…

1 day ago

Gas South CEO Kevin Greiner On The Value Of Being An ‘Even-Keeled’ Leader

Staying cool and consistent under pressure shows your team that you are ready to handle…

3 days ago

How To Break Up With China

A playbook for a fast-transforming world.

4 days ago