Sponsored Content

Post-Pandemic Space Reductions Can Create Financial Opportunities

By rethinking how employees work companies can reduce the amount of office space they need, driving lower costs and a better employee experience.

For many organizations, the results of the pandemic-driven shift to remote work have been better than expected. This has prompted leaders across industries to rethink how and where their employees work for the longer term, with 76% of CEOs in a recent Deloitte poll indicating that their organizations would need less space moving forward. This in turn can drive significant cost savings in both operating costs and capital expenditures. Real estate and facilities, often one of an organization’s top three expenses, can represent 2% to 5% of organizational revenue. The extent of the potential savings depends on several factors, including:

  • What is the employer’s position on remote work? Employers that permit remote work will need to decide how frequently employees need to be in the office, which will shape leadership decisions on how much space the organization needs. Employers typically fall into one of three categories; traditional, progressive, or visionary depending on the percentage of time a worker can work remotely. A higher percentage of remote work is linked to larger opportunities for savings through reduced footprint requirements.
  • Historically, many organizations would open a physical location to attract new employees in a particular market. With the greater acceptance of remote working, organizations are now increasingly looking to attract talent in markets where they do not have physical space. The extent to which leaders seek talent in such markets will also influence the amount of space an organization must maintain.

When addressing the issue of how much space an organization needs to operate with a remote-enabled workforce, one critical dependency has been identified. Accurate, organized and consistently collected data is a key enabler when seeking to optimize the built environment. To answer the question of how to build the workplace of tomorrow, organizations must first understand how their spaces are used today.

 

 

 

In practice, employers often find themselves using multiple disconnected systems to track a variety of data points around space configuration and employee behavior. Without established polices supporting sound data governance and a central database to store information, it is extremely difficult to efficiently understand how real estate is being used to add value to an organization.

Key questions an organization should answer through its real estate data strategy are:

  • Location Characteristics: Is a given location owned or leased? What is the business function of the location? When are leases expiring in the portfolio? What options does the organization hold with respect to renewing or exiting a space?
  • Employee Utilization: How many employees are assigned to a location? What are their roles? How often are they in the office? What spaces are they using to perform their work?
  • Space Categorization: What types of spaces exist within a location (i.e. workstations, conference rooms, telephone booths, enclosed offices, dining facilities, etc.)? How often are different space types used during the work week? What is the total footprint for each space type within a location?
  • Portfolio Costs: What are the occupancy costs associated with a location? What are the costs of capital projects planned for the next three years? How has the cost base for the portfolio changed over time?

Enterprise portfolio data represents a key competitive advantage in a post-pandemic world. Real estate data is the foundational element of effective cost reduction planning. Transparency in the form of internal benchmarking often brings to light portfolio inefficiencies both in terms of cost and usage.

Operational and executive management teams that can leverage accurate information are empowered to make better and more informed decisions. This results in actionable recommendations that can lower the overall cost of occupancy by eliminating unnecessary space.

 

David Asker and Kyle Primm

David Asker (dasker@deloitte.com) is a senior manager and Kyle Primm (kprimm@deloitte.com ) is a manager at Deloitte Consulting LLP in the Real Estate & Location Strategy practice.

Share
Published by
David Asker and Kyle Primm

Recent Posts

Building An ‘AI First’ Accounting Powerhouse

Aprio CEO Richard Kopelman on 14 deals in a year, a $300 million AI bet…

1 day ago

U.S. Manufacturers More Optimistic In May, Despite Continued Volatility

Though volatile pressure continues to temper current business forecasts in the sector, year-ahead manufacturing confidence…

2 days ago

‘We Will Not Have Stability Again’: Takeaways From The 2026 Manufacturing Leaders Summit In St. Louis

In an era of tariffs, China, AI, margin pressure and continued economic uncertainty the best…

2 days ago

Why Your Company’s Customer Experience Isn’t Working Anymore

Once you commit to a truly customer-centric operation, the path you chart will be very…

2 days ago

The Rebuild That Took Our Family Business From Shutdown To $80 Million

After a decade, we’ve found that distributed teams outperform when the operating infrastructure is right.

2 days ago

Finding Balance During Leadership Transitions

Leadership turnover creates uncertainty fast, especially when employees lose sight of the company’s core values.…

3 days ago