AdobeStock
The real conclusion of the Trump-Xi summit is this: Two leaders have agreed to continue talking to each other in a civil and respectful manner. Their subordinates will do the same.
That is the sum total of what was achieved. For America’s goals this is a long haul. For Xi it is not. He continues his march.
Two areas of genuine mutual interest will keep the dialogue alive. The first is AI. The second is avoiding miscommunication if a military conflict breaks out. On AI, the question of who is ahead at any given moment matters less than most people think. What matters more is who will use it and when.
This is an area where one side leaps forward and the other catches up, repeatedly. Temporary superiority means less than the willingness and readiness to act. And on this point, Xi’s framing of the AI conversation as not about winning or losing should be read carefully. It is multipolar language.
The intention is to reduce American influence, not to cooperate as equals. Both areas will continue to be discussed because both are genuinely destructive if mismanaged. That shared interest in avoiding catastrophe is the only real foundation for dialogue.
The two month trade extension is a concession, not a solution. The question that matters for American business is what will actually be done in those two months to reduce the trade deficit and counter China’s ability to disrupt American industries and supply chains. The honest answer is that nothing fundamental has changed.
Plenty of leaders have delegated AI. Very, very few have figured out what it can…
Manufacturers rated current conditions higher in October than in any month this year, even as…
Record CEO turnover and an AI transition that most companies are failing to profit from…
Nearly 70 percent of all value creation comes from the acceleration of organic revenue growth.…
AI literacy programs for leaders are largely exercises in branding rather than learning.
Hiscox USA CEO Mary Boyd on the exposures leaders are missing and how a growing…