Politics/Policy

States, Localities Join the Feds in the Fight Against Companies Dodging Taxes  

The governments, of course, all are motivated by the same basic urge: to hold on to the tax-revenue streams they’ve created and expand them if possible.

The federal impetus finally seems to have gained traction with the latest move, as Pfizer and Allergan abruptly called off their merger. But some of the lower governments’ actions may be motivated by political more than fiscal impulses.

“Lawmakers last year introduced 16 bills in 11 states and the District of Columbia aimed at mitigating the use of offshore tax havens by companies based in those states.”

For example, the City of Philadelphia is attempting to stem the use of inversions by way of a measure which would require any firm that wants to enter into a contract with the city to sign a contract stating that it is not a tax-inversion company, according to McDonald Hopkins, a corporate-law firm. At the state level, the firm said, lawmakers last year introduced 16 bills in 11 states and the District of Columbia aimed at mitigating the use of offshore tax havens by companies based in those states. And Connecticut and D.C. actually passed anti-haven measures. This year, such activity has picked up even more.

A bill in Kansas would establish that a corporation may be subject to state tax laws if it is incorporated in tax havens such as Aruba and the Bahamas. And in Kentucky, a bill requires combined reporting of all business income, disallows tax haven transactions and requires disclosure of all reportable transactions, according to Bloomberg.

Yet, the publication noted that it’s not a slam-dunk case that allowing the use of tax havens actually hurts state revenues: “[T]he volume of empirical data substantiating or refuting the need for tax-haven legislation is vast and often difficult to reconcile.”

And the State Tax Research Institute recently concluded that there is little clear evidence to support the argument that profit shifting to tax havens is eroding the state corporate tax base.

Still, as long as state legislators and governors pursue such legislation either for fiscal or political reasons, or both, more boards likely will have to be dealing with the issue.

Dale Buss

Dale Buss is a long-time contributor to Chief Executive, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and other business publications. He lives in Michigan.

Share
Published by
Dale Buss

Recent Posts

Calero CRO Eric Martorano Knows Stories Can Be Our Most Powerful Tool

Calero, argues that data informs but stories drive action—making narrative clarity a core leadership skill…

1 day ago

The 3 Lessons Of Tim Cook

There are many, of course, from the Apple CEO, who just announced he is stepping…

1 day ago

An Autism Diagnosis At 55 Reframed This CEO’s Entire Life

From naval combat to building companies, his remarkable ability to remain calm wasn’t coldness or…

2 days ago

Raising The Bar: A More Disciplined Way To Hire Senior Leaders

Without a forward-looking lens, even a well-run process can produce the wrong outcome.

5 days ago

The State Of The States: Who’s Building The Future Of Business?

As the nation marks a quarter millennium, Chief Executive’s annual CEO survey of the Best…

5 days ago

Best & Worst States For Business 2026: Inside The Rankings

Our annual survey of more than 650 CEOs, presidents and business owners—with representation from every…

5 days ago