The Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”)
• PPP Compensation Caps
Employers that avail themselves of the PPP forgivable loan program are limited in their use of such funds, and the circumstances under which such loans may be forgiven. For example, the combined total of salary and other wages that may be paid to any one employee is capped at the annualized equivalent of $100,000. Employee benefits such as paid leave, separation pay, payments of health and other insurance premiums, and retirement contributions are not included in that cap.
• PPP Headcount and Compensation Incentives
In addition to limiting how such funds may be used, the PPP provides loan forgiveness tied to maintaining both head-count (either by retention or timely re-hire) and the compensation of certain employees (those who earned less than $100,000 in 2019). Specifically, loan forgiveness is reduced if the wages of any such employee is reduced by more than 25%. Thus, intentionally or not, the PPP may incentivize employers to eliminate the employment of higher-paid employees.
The Coronavirus Economic Stabilization Act (“CESA”)
• CESA Total Compensation Caps and the Covered Period
Employers that receive loans and loan guarantees under the CESA are binding themselves to certain restrictions relative to executive compensation for any officer or employee who received total compensation greater than $425,000 in 2019. During the period of the loan or loan guarantee, and for one year thereafter (or longer for employers in certain industries), the following restrictions apply:
• Definition of Total Compensation, and Additional Requirements
Total compensation is defined as including salary, bonuses, equity, and other financial benefits, but there is, as of yet, no guidance regarding what is meant to be included. For example, it is uncertain whether unvested and/or deferred compensation will be counted. Also, mid-size employers (those with 500 to 10,000 workers) receiving CESA loans must also make aspirational commitments, e.g. maintaining compensation and headcount, not sending jobs off-shore, and remaining neutral regarding unionizing.
• Employment Contracts, Deferred Compensation Plans, and IRC, § 409A
Needless to say, CESA restrictions may run contrary to contractual obligations owed by an employer to an executive, giving rise to a breach of contract claim and/or by triggering a good reason termination by the executive under the terms of the executive’s contract. The CESA restrictions may also put executive compensation plans in violation of their own rules.
Furthermore, efforts to protect executive compensation by agreeing to post-restriction deferral may run afoul of Internal Revenue Code, § 409A. This would be of dire consequence as a § 409A violation could result in the immediate recognition of deferred amounts as income to the executive and the imposition against the executive of a 20% penalty tax and other possible penalties. Hopefully, the Internal Revenue Service will provide interim emergency relief – but, again, there is no guidance and the matter is currently unresolved.
If you have reason to believe that your compensation or contractual rights may be impacted by the CARES Act, we urge you to seek legal counsel as soon as possible.
CEO and author Leigh Burgess shares the personal story that led her to leave her…
In this week's Corporate Competitor Podcast, Levine shares the simple wisdom that led to his…
Despite a vocal fringe, most Americans continue to admire businesses and their leaders as vital…
A month after the presidential election, CEOs’ outlook for the economy continues to rise fueled…
To avoid a pandemic-era crisis again, now's the time to shore upyour supply chain strategy.
CEOs of PE-backed companies face rising expectations from sponsors amid economic uncertainty and high capital…