Categories: Uncategorized

The CEO’s Role In Corporate Governance

While preparing our article on Best Boards/Worst Boards (see p. 26), Bob Yavitz and I often discussed the factors that really make boards work effectively. We agree that it takes three elements: a confident and open-minded CEO; at least one or two strong, dedicated, and knowledgeable directors; and a considerable amount of organized planning and working together to capture the full benefits of a corporate-governance program.

What concerns me is that all CEOs are not “confident and open-minded” about corporate governance. There are still many chairmen/CEOs who have reservations about the corporate-governance moves under way in boardrooms these days.

“Why should I turn over the selection of new director candidates, the appointment of committee chairmen and members, and control of the board meeting agenda to my outside directors?” they ask. “Why should I be evaluated on my performance by the board unless the directors are similarly measured? Why should I put myself in such a precarious position that the very continuation of my job depends upon the whim of a few outside directors? Leave me alone to choose my own directors, run the board the way I want to, and then let the shareholders judge me on the company’s financial results. If they don’t like it, they can sell their stock.”

These words are seldom spoken aloud, but the actions of certain CEOs and companies indicate that this philosophy sometimes prevails. It seems to be particularly true of a few arrogant CEOs who are overwhelmed with their importance and power; of CEOs who founded their companies; of CEOs who own a great deal of stock; and of CEOs who are insecure in their jobs and fear director criticism.

A few of these CEOs will “get religion” and change their ways, rejuvenate their boards, and give it a good if belated try. A few more may go through the motions of embracing corporate governance. But the mere establishment of a Corporate Governance Committee and having a “once-over-lightly” performance evaluation of the CEO and the board is not, in itself, going to make good corporate governance happen. It won’t and can’t work until the CEO wants it to.

Most of these recalcitrant CEOs are not going to change their ways-or even pretend to do so. Nothing is going to happen until these CEOs retire or are replaced. I suspect we will have a number of candidates for our “Worst Board” selections for some years to come.

As a long-time corporate observer, I have always had disdain for those executives and especially CEOs-who surround themselves with sycophants and gophers. They seem to be afraid that brighter, stronger people will detract from their luster. I consider it to be a form of weakness and insecurity. And, in time, it usually has a deleterious impact upon the executive’s career and the company’s operation.

Much the same reasoning applies to boards. The chairmen/CEOs who pack their boards with their executives, their suppliers of goods and services, and their personal friends are giving short shrift to their companies and themselves. They do not have the depth of talent and experience on their boards to give them the kind of counsel they need, especially in times of crisis. When they and their boards become a target of institutional shareholders, should anyone be surprised? Will anybody shed a tear? I don’t think so.

The fact remains-and it will always be true that the chairman/CEO is still the key to the success of both the company and the board. No matter how good the board is, without a capable CEO in charge, the company will not reach its competitive potential.

The best combination is when a strong and competent CEO blends his or her leadership skills with a group of informed, participative directors, and, together, they develop a corporate-governance program. They start with a thorough review of the composition and structure of the board. Then they begin the dynamic processes that make the structure come alive. Finally, they learn to interact as they coalesce into an effective working board. When this fortuitous combination of a confident, open-minded CEO and some dedicated, knowledgeable directors is in place, all kinds of good things start to happen and keep on happening.


Formerly the CEO of F.&M. Schaefer (19721977), Robert W Lear is chairman of CE’s advisory board. He also teaches at Columbia Business School, where he is an executive-inresidence. He is an independent general partner of Equitable Capital Partners and holds directorships with Scudder Institutional Funds; Korea Fund; and Welsh, Carson, Anderson, Stowe Venture Capital Co.; and is a partner of Lear, Yavitz & Associates.


Chief Executive

Chief Executive magazine (published since 1977) is the definitive source that CEOs turn to for insight and ideas that help increase their effectiveness and grow their business. Chief Executive Group also produces e-newsletters and online content at chiefexecutive.net and manages Chief Executive Network and other executive peer groups, as well as conferences and roundtables that enable top corporate officers to discuss key subjects and share their experiences within a community of peers. Chief Executive facilitates the annual “CEO of the Year,” a prestigious honor bestowed upon an outstanding corporate leader, nominated and selected by a group of peers, and is known throughout the U.S. and elsewhere for its annual ranking of Best & Worst States for Business. Visit www.chiefexecutive.net for more information.

Share
Published by
Chief Executive

Recent Posts

Best & Worst States for Business 2024 Survey Finds Unsettled CEOs Ready To Roam

Latest Chief Executive survey of Best & Worst States for Business demonstrates upward mobility is…

14 hours ago

Best & Worst States: Why An Indian Graphite Manufacturer Chose North Carolina

Epsilon Advanced Materials is tapping into American EV transition by siting a $650-million plant.

14 hours ago

Best & Worst States: How An Office Megacenter Is Adjusting To New Realities

Arlington County, Virginia, takes creative and multipronged approach to cutting its high office-vacancy rate.

14 hours ago

Best & Worst States: CEO Poll Finds 49% ‘More Open’ To New Locations Than A Year Ago

Our 2024 Best & Worst States for business survey finds chief executives settling into new…

14 hours ago

Best & Worst States: ‘Mr. Wonderful’ Is Now Endorsing Entire States, Not Just Startups

Shark Tank celebrity investor O’Leary really loves Oklahoma and other 'flyover' states while training specific…

14 hours ago

Will Delaware Stay Supreme?

How did the nation’s second-smallest state become a business mecca—and will it stay that way?

4 days ago