Almost a year ago, the Obama administration moved to protect the U.S corporate tax base from so-called inversion deals in which boards would approve acquisitions of foreign firms so that, by moving their domicile abroad, they could significantly lower the company’s tax rate. The Treasury Department moved to protect billions of dollars in future taxes by revising certain sections of the U.S. tax code to make inversions harder to achieve.
But while the new rules stopped some deals and influenced others—such as Walgreen, which decided to acquire the UK’s Alliance Boots chain but retain its headquarters in Chicago—the “tax inversion wave keeps rolling,” as The Wall Street Journal recently reported.
For one thing, the Treasury rules mainly thwarted inversion deals that were designed to access cash trapped abroad and that companies wanted to tap into without paying U.S. taxes. But other inversion maneuvers are still allowed, such as one known as “earnings stripping” in which companies can effectively shift earnings to lower-tax countries, Bloomberg reported.
Plus, while high-profile inversion deals involving marquee companies have faded, many boards of smaller companies—whose moves wouldn’t be so noticeable or politically charged—are still considering inversion deals.
But there’s another twist: Many U.S.-origin companies that previously used the tax-inversion ploy to re-domicile abroad are coming back into the country to buy American companies, “turbocharged” by their new lower tax rates, according to the Journal. In fact, since the Treasury Department rules went into effect last fall, 55 U.S. companies have been sold to or targeted by foreign buyers.
“Companies that do deals primarily driven by tax considerations are headed for trouble,” Bill George, a professor of management practice at Harvard Business School, warned directors a year ago, before the Treasury action. “The only justification for a merger or acquisition is to strengthen your company’s strategic position.”
Back then, he offered 5 questions boards should apply to any potential tax-inversion-based deal today, and they serve as an excellent refresher for anyone who is currently considering such a deal.
All of that—plus the basic patriotism-versus-opportunism argument—is a lot for boards to consider in potential tax-inversion deals. They’re one of the most high-profile things a board can do these days, so it’s important to get such decisions right.
Why companies like Nokia are betting on Middlesex County, New Jersey—where smart governance meets private-sector…
The warehouse automation equipment maker is investing in a strong supply chain by building production…
Strategy processes are getting squeezed. Answering these questions will set you up for building and…
The key lies in a progressive implementation of control mechanisms, each adding a new layer…
To celebrate the 40th CEO of the Year, we share some lessons learned along the…
Chief Executive Group CEO Marshall Cooper opens the 40th annual celebration, this year honoring Lilly’s…