For example, while 73 percent of respondents said that their companies’ base-pay increases were set on performance levels, just 34 percent felt the practice was very effective. The perceived effectiveness of efforts like formal reviews, goal-setting and informal feedback was lukewarm (see chart, below). In fact, the only practice respondents ranked as “very effective” was “other monetary compensation” or offering bonuses based on performance. What’s more, a whopping 35 percent of respondents graded their companies at a “C” or below on overall effectiveness of performance management.
Why do so many attempts to improve performance yield so little? Respondents cited managers who aren’t comfortable making “tough calls,” holding people accountable, failing to maintain consistent standards and providing constructive feedback. What’s more, managers lack training in performance management and find the process too time-intensive.
Executive energy is not a private concern to be managed behind closed doors. It’s a…
Our latest survey finds CEOs increasingly confident in their ability to find growth in the…
More than half of the manufacturer’s employee base is formerly incarcerated—tapping into an underutilized talent…
When credible voices retreat, social media "hacks" fill the void. Northwestern Mutual's CEO shares four…
In a buyer-led market with stretched sales cycles, quarterly reviews aren't enough. CEOs need weekly…
Getting to know the many sides of your team members—their hobbies, interests, backgrounds, previous work…