For example, while 73 percent of respondents said that their companies’ base-pay increases were set on performance levels, just 34 percent felt the practice was very effective. The perceived effectiveness of efforts like formal reviews, goal-setting and informal feedback was lukewarm (see chart, below). In fact, the only practice respondents ranked as “very effective” was “other monetary compensation” or offering bonuses based on performance. What’s more, a whopping 35 percent of respondents graded their companies at a “C” or below on overall effectiveness of performance management.
Why do so many attempts to improve performance yield so little? Respondents cited managers who aren’t comfortable making “tough calls,” holding people accountable, failing to maintain consistent standards and providing constructive feedback. What’s more, managers lack training in performance management and find the process too time-intensive.
Landing a lucrative seat on a public company board is a crapshoot, at best. Here’s…
How an entrepreneur built his company by helping farmer-inventors turn practical equipment upgrades into products…
On this week’s Corporate Competitor Podcast, David Yaeger shows leaders how to turn comparison into…
CEO Cabe shares how the company well-known for tires is putting more than a century…
On the surface, everything looks and feels aligned. Underneath, dissent goes unspoken, accountability erodes and…
Time management asks a tactical question: How do I fit everything in? Time ownership asks…