For example, while 73 percent of respondents said that their companies’ base-pay increases were set on performance levels, just 34 percent felt the practice was very effective. The perceived effectiveness of efforts like formal reviews, goal-setting and informal feedback was lukewarm (see chart, below). In fact, the only practice respondents ranked as “very effective” was “other monetary compensation” or offering bonuses based on performance. What’s more, a whopping 35 percent of respondents graded their companies at a “C” or below on overall effectiveness of performance management.
Why do so many attempts to improve performance yield so little? Respondents cited managers who aren’t comfortable making “tough calls,” holding people accountable, failing to maintain consistent standards and providing constructive feedback. What’s more, managers lack training in performance management and find the process too time-intensive.
Lone-wolf leadership doesn't work anymore. Today’s most impactful leaders foster cultures of collaboration and shared…
U.S. manufacturers rate current conditions at their worst level since the pandemic, but continue to…
An all-star team is the foundation for success. CEO Barrow shares his tool to help…
The annual Yale CEO Caucus drew many of the top names in American business—and little…
Instead of poking about this as a “Should we explore AI?” moment, perhaps we need…
Having clarity about who we are allows us to envision the person—and leader—we want to…