For example, while 73 percent of respondents said that their companies’ base-pay increases were set on performance levels, just 34 percent felt the practice was very effective. The perceived effectiveness of efforts like formal reviews, goal-setting and informal feedback was lukewarm (see chart, below). In fact, the only practice respondents ranked as “very effective” was “other monetary compensation” or offering bonuses based on performance. What’s more, a whopping 35 percent of respondents graded their companies at a “C” or below on overall effectiveness of performance management.
Why do so many attempts to improve performance yield so little? Respondents cited managers who aren’t comfortable making “tough calls,” holding people accountable, failing to maintain consistent standards and providing constructive feedback. What’s more, managers lack training in performance management and find the process too time-intensive.
When it comes to pay in 2026, our latest survey finds division heads and supervisors…
The companies that scale consistently are not the ones with the most heroic individual performers.…
The two-time NBA champion has taken the lessons he learned on the court and brought…
How this Shark Tank–winner apparel startup is forcing founder Justin Baer to make fast, high‑stakes…
Corporate leadership is entering a new era of transparency. These guidelines can help leaders thoughtfully…
The leaders who consistently outperform their peers are not better strategists. In my experience, they…