For example, while 73 percent of respondents said that their companies’ base-pay increases were set on performance levels, just 34 percent felt the practice was very effective. The perceived effectiveness of efforts like formal reviews, goal-setting and informal feedback was lukewarm (see chart, below). In fact, the only practice respondents ranked as “very effective” was “other monetary compensation” or offering bonuses based on performance. What’s more, a whopping 35 percent of respondents graded their companies at a “C” or below on overall effectiveness of performance management.
Why do so many attempts to improve performance yield so little? Respondents cited managers who aren’t comfortable making “tough calls,” holding people accountable, failing to maintain consistent standards and providing constructive feedback. What’s more, managers lack training in performance management and find the process too time-intensive.
CEO Lars Petersen shares how Fujifilm took advantage of technological competencies to pivot and build…
When results wobble, elite teams don’t grit their teeth—they rely on conditions built long before…
The rapidly spreading autonomous agentic AI system highlights how agent-based technologies are advancing faster than…
When work swallows everything, it’s not a badge of honor—it’s a warning. In this week’s…
How Shivani Dhamija shut down a failing concept, pivoted to packaged foods and built Shivani’s…
A new survey examines how public and private companies manage short-term demands against long-term strategy—and…