Pointing to a study that appeared two years ago in the Journal of Portfolio Management titled “Stocks of Admired and Spurned Companies,” Hulbert thinks great reputations tend to be overvalued. The articles authors examined the stocks of firms that appeared on Fortune’s annual list of “America’s Most Admired Companies from 1983 to 2007. The Fortune list is compiled differently than the Harris survey but many of the same firms appear on both lists. The researchers found that the spurned companies at the bottom of Fortune’s list often fared better than those that appeared at the top. Hulbert’s thinking as written recently in The Wall Street Journal, is a contrarian interpretation. Stocks that appear among the most admire have already performed well over the previous 12 months. This may be one of the reasons the company is highly admire in the first place.
But investors might want to take a look at spurned companies. Hulbert thinks that such companies don’t necessarily have to perform well for its stock to be a good bet. Companies that enjoy the worst reputations according to Harris (see below) include AIG, Goldman Sachs, and Citigroup. Their bad odor is likely fueled by memories of their association with the credit crunch of 2008.
Hulbert says that trying to profit from contrarian patterns such as reputation can be tricky. “The broader investment lesson is to avoid getting caught up in the herd mentality that otherwise can so easily influence our stock picking,” he writes.
Following is Harris Interactives’ 10 companies with the worst reputation in America.
In each of the last three years, Harris Interactive has ranked Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ: CMCSA) as one of its least reputable companies. A major issue for the company has been customer service. According to MSN, at least 20% rated Comcast’s customer service as “poor” — just one of three companies with so many dissatisfied customers. ACSI reported last year that both Comcast’s fixed line telephone and subscription television businesses were ranked among the lowest in their respective sectors for consumer satisfaction. But poor customer sentiment has not hurt the company’s bottom line. Shares are up over 47% over the last year, and the company was recently able to purchase the remainder of NBCUniversal for $16.7 billion.
Wells Fargo & Co.’s (NYSE: WFC) reputation score rose only slightly compared to last year. Still, according to Harris Interactive, it became the first of the “big four” banks whose consumers indicated they have started to admire and trust again. In the last year, the company’s stock rose just 16%, versus 29.4% for JPMorgan, 33% for Citigroup, and more than 50% for Bank of America. The company has also been unable to separate itself from perceptions of other similarly-large banks among consumers. Alongside JPMorgan, Bank of America, and Citigroup, Wells Fargo was named one of the worst companies for customer service in 2012 by MSN and JZ Analytics.
While the financial crisis didn’t hit the bank as hard as it did most of its peers, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) has had its share of controversies over the past year. The company lost approximately $5.8 billion when a trader commonly referred to as the London Whale took excessively large trading positions in complex financial instruments that ended up souring. In addition, there have been reports that the firm pushed its own mutual funds to clients over competitor funds even though they had cheaper and more-profitable options. J.P. Morgan’s brand value in 2012 declined 8% compared to 2011, according to Interbrand.
In 2010, the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill damaged BP PLC’s (NYSE: BP) reputation so deeply that three years later — even after its CEO resigned in disgrace — it remains both highly visible and poorly rated. One reason for the company’s continued visibility, explained Harris Interactive’s Robert Fronk, is its own continuing ad campaign to highlight the remediation efforts it has made in the gulf region. “What they’re doing,” Fronk explained, “is saying ‘we’re owning up to it, and we want you to know that we didn’t just make a one-time payoff and we hope you forget about it, we’re trying to show you over a five-year window that we continue to take accountability for what happened.” Since 2011, BP has had one of the largest improvements in reputation of any company Harris has measured.
Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) is still working to improve its image following its near destruction at the height of of the financial crisis, even as it continues to struggle. Brand Z noted that Citi’s brand value has declined 38% in the last year. Interbrand, on the other hand, said in its study that Citi’s brand value has declined just 12% year-over-year. Only 17.3% of respondents to the MSN survey rated Citigroup’s customer service as “excellent,” while 17% rated the customer service as “poor.” Citigroup has undergone some changes recently. The company’s board ousted CEO Vikram Pandit in October and replaced him with company veteran Michael Corbat. The company recently announced it was cutting 11,000 positions from the company.
Like most financial services companies, Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) is still reeling from the damage to its reputation caused by the bank’s role in the financial crisis. Yet the company has improved its reputation in the last year. In 2012, the financial services giant ranked third from the bottom, beating out only Goldman Sachs and AIG and receiving a “critical” reputational ranking. Fronk of Harris Interactive notes that Bank of America has improved in all six categories. He noted that since the company took a hard fall in reputation during the financial crisis, and that the company’s reputation has had a tailwind on its way back up.
American Airlines was considered the most visible company of the past several months, according to Fronk, although it was not known for its sterling reputation. Along with much of the airline industry, American Airlines slashed its employees’ pay and eliminated many jobs. Only 37% of employees completing surveys on Glassdoor approve of CEO Thomas Horton’s performance. American Airline’s parent company, AMR, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy back in 2011. On Thursday, American Airlines and US Airways jointly announced an $11 billion merger, which the world’s largest airline and bring AMR out of bankruptcy.
Although it has not been as much in the news as it was during the Bush administration, Halliburton Co. (NYSE: HAL) ranks as one of the nation’s most visible — and least reputable — companies for 2013. Halliburton is the world’s second largest oilfield services company, behind Schlumberger Ltd., and it has benefitted from increased spending by oil explorers and producers. However, Halliburton is a “leading provider of hydraulic fracturing services,” which remains extremely controversial. In a bold move to show fracking was safe, an employee drank the fluid used in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, at a conference in 2011.
Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) is one of just two companies to receive a reputation score below 50, which Harris refers to as “critical.” The company has been in the hot seat in the last several years as many argued that it played a large role in the financial crisis. In the last year, Goldman Sachs found itself mired in controversy once again when a former employee named Greg Smith wrote his resignation in The New York Times, arguing that company employees put their own interests before the interest of their clients. In Interbrand’s most recent brand rankings, Goldman’s value declined by 16% compared to the previous year. Fronk noted that the company is the least trusted in America, with 76% of Americans believing that Goldman would not act in their best interest.
Insurance giant American International Group Inc. (NYSE: AIG) is the least reputable company in the country for the fifth year in a row, scoring in the “critical” range in each of those five years. The company’s reputation was significantly damaged in the midst of the financial crisis when it was required to accept bailout money from the U.S. government. Recently, AIG has initiated a public relations campaign that explains it has returned all the money the federal government lent it during the financial crisis, and that the government has actually netted a profit. At the same time, the company weighed suing the federal government, arguing that high interest rates and other restrictions on the company were not in the shareholders’ interest and also unconstitutional. AIG ultimately decided not to sue.
Read more: Companies with the Best (and Worst) Reputations – 24/7 Wall St. https://247wallst.com/2013/02/15/companies-with-the-best-and-worst-reputations/#ixzz2NF5HGKpi
How did the nation’s second-smallest state become a business mecca—and will it stay that way?
The intersection of employment law and geopolitics presents complex challenges for organizations operating in a…
If AI strategy is not unfolding according to plan, it's usually down to missing one…
Automation Alley COO Pavan Muzumdar gives insight into how manufacturers can deploy generative AI, right…
Amid a swirl of pushback—practical, political and legal—two authors offer an alternative path to pragmatically…