AdobeStock
When I was getting Vital off the ground in 2016, I knew nothing about healthcare. One of the ways I educated myself was by shadowing my co-founder and brother-in-law, Dr. Justin Schrager, who worked nights in the ER at a university hospital. Before my first overnight, I asked him whether I should wear my favorite shirt or if I’d end up with blood on it. I had a TV-inspired vision of chaos: arterial spurts, trauma bays, emergency drama.
Instead, I saw patients hunched in chairs, miserable with colds and stomach bugs. They were in pain, but forced to wait hours because staff were calmly prioritizing more severe cases. What felt like an emergency to patients was routine triage to the clinicians. It was clear to me that I knew absolutely nothing about healthcare.
But that ignorance turned out to be an asset, not a liability.
Eight years later, Vital serves 7 million patients annually across major health systems like CommonSpirit Health, Mercy Health and Emory Healthcare. We’re in the top 1 percent of all health tech startups. True, I still don’t have the kind of industry credibility I earned in three years at Mint. I walk into meetings with a big “V” for vendor on my forehead, while my co-founder gets immediate respect because he has an MD.
But here’s what I’ve learned: Being an outsider forces you to solve problems differently than insiders ever would. And in industries that are fundamentally broken—which certainly describes healthcare—a different perspective is exactly what’s needed.
Healthcare has four core problems that insiders accept as unsolvable. First, the economics are backwards: Patients don’t know costs, don’t bear costs and can’t shop for better prices. Second, the threat of lawsuits kills innovation because one doctor saying, “What about this one-in-10,000 scenario?” can kill deals that 19 others support. Third, incumbent technology is 20 years behind because giant electronic health record (EHR) companies use Microsoft’s 1990s playbook of copying innovations and bundling them for free. Fourth, people don’t engage with their health the way they engage with their finances.
Every healthcare insider I meet simply accepts the above as immutable. But I spent years at Mint solving similar problems in finance. The psychological challenges are nearly identical—both industries deal with things that are boring, scary and have dire consequences if ignored. The technical challenges are similar, too: regulated environments with messy, heterogeneous data that needs to be unified into consistent experiences.
The difference is that healthcare insiders can’t see past industry constraints. They know too much about why things don’t work to imagine how they could work differently.
The biggest mistake outsiders make is becoming insiders too quickly. You lose your most valuable asset—your outsider perspective—before you understand how to apply it.
When I started Vital, I spent three years trying to learn everything about healthcare before building anything substantial. In addition to overnight shifts in the ER, I sat through medical conferences, talked to experts and tried to absorb decades of institutional knowledge. That was partly necessary, but it also made me less effective.
The emails solved the engagement problem by forcing people to think about their finances regularly, even when they didn’t want to. They kept users connected to their financial data and made them aware of their spending, before they spent more.
Healthcare experts have said that wouldn’t work for health, but they’re wrong. People’s relationship with boring, important information is consistent across domains.
That first night in the emergency room, I had no idea what I was looking at. While my brother-in-law moved efficiently through the chaos, I was completely lost. But my ignorance wasn’t an obstacle to overcome quickly; it was a diagnostic tool that exposed where the industry had normalized dysfunction. Lessons learned:
I still don’t have the credibility in healthcare that I had in finance, despite eight years of work and millions of patients served. But I’ve learned to work around that limitation instead of fighting it.
Every industry has its own psychological dynamics that outsiders initially miss. In finance, consumers make decisions daily but hate thinking about them. In healthcare, patients avoid thinking about their health until they’re forced to by a crisis.
The moment I stopped trying to become a healthcare insider and started positioning Vital as bringing proven consumer technology approaches to healthcare, everything changed. We weren’t trying to be better healthcare software—we were bringing outside innovation to a broken industry.
This positioning works with the market because:
The biggest risk for successful outsiders is gaining too much acceptance and losing the perspective that makes you valuable.
After eight years in healthcare, I could probably get industry credibility if I focused on it. But when incumbent competitors copy our innovations, it forces us to think beyond traditional healthcare vendor approaches toward direct-to-consumer models that bypass industry gatekeepers entirely.
The industries most desperate for outsider innovation are usually the ones most resistant to it. Your job as CEO isn’t to become an industry insider. It’s to stay enough of an outsider to see solutions that insiders can’t, while building enough insider credibility to implement them.
As investor influence expands beyond earnings season, companies need better ways to control their narrative.
American Leather president and COO Veronica Schnitzius is applying lessons learned from a wide-ranging career…
Paying attention to HRV values can be a helpful tool to learn about your body’s…
According to Gallagher, mentorship starts with curiosity: 'Get to know people, be present. This is…
From weekly war-room meetings to testifying in D.C., Julie Robbins has spent the past year…
Despite stressors associated with heightened global risk mounting since early 2026, U.S. manufacturers express increased…