Boards

Sonnenfeld: Vote to Keep Peltz Off P&G’s Board a “Sea Change”

Trian Fund Management CEO Nelson Peltz

Proctor & Gamble shareholders narrowly voted to deny activist investor and CEO of Trian Fund Management Nelson Peltz a seat on the company’s board of directors this week, a move that could send a message to minority investors looking to force proxy contests at big corporations in the future.

“This is a sea change—a major fork in the road signifying resolve and backbone in boards of directors to stand up and discourage activist short-termism,” Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, senior associate dean for leadership studies at Yale School of Management told Chief Executive. “This gives a strong shot in the arm to fortify boards that they should fight back and not fold up like lawn chairs because somebody has a one-percent ownership in the company.”

The momentum behind the vote was fueled by smaller, individual investors who supported P&G’s vision for the future, while most institutional investors supported Peltz and his hope to shake up the organization. Peltz, however, hasn’t formally conceded defeat, and is waiting for the vote count to be certified.

“This, hopefully, will be a harbinger of more losses in these activist proxy battles,” Jeffrey Sonnenfeld

While many big investors talk a big game about fighting activists, they often follow the lead of proxy rating firms when it comes time to vote, Sonnenfeld says.

“Take a look at what institutional investors do and not what they say. [BlackRock CEO] Larry Fink was everywhere in the media these last 18 months, on three different commissions on long-term investing and making the big battle cry against activists, and then BlackRock voted with Peltz,” he says.

As far as Peltz and Trian’s role moving forward, don’t expect him to drift off silently in the wake of this close proxy vote.

“He’s not going away because he has the patience of Rumpelstiltskin,” Sonnenfeld says. “He is given to tantrums over losing and he won’t be happy about this. It’s a big affront.”

Boards of directors that are facing activist threats and the possibility of proxy battles have no bigger example than this week’s vote of how effectively communicating a company’s vision for future success can top the messages of activist investors.

“This hopefully will be a harbinger of more losses in these activist proxy battles,” Sonnenfeld says. “We’ve had a 42 percent increase just over this past year in proxy battles being settled early on, and that’s a shame. They should wage the battle and they’ll win.”


Patrick Gorman

Patrick Gorman is managing editor of Chief Executive magazine and Corporate Board Member magazine. He is based in Stamford, CT.

Share
Published by
Patrick Gorman

Recent Posts

From Supply Chain Chaos To Global Growth: How Women Executives Are Shaping Industrial Manufacturing

Innovation in manufacturing is not just about machines or technology; it’s about people.

2 days ago

CEO Health Checklist: The 8 Brain Must-Dos

It controls thought, movement and emotion. Here’s how to protect it and maximize its performance.

2 days ago

Pivoting To Partnerships: Why A Partner-Led Sales Model Can Fuel Your Growth

Changing sales strategy requires a new mindset, different skills and a thoughtful approach to execution.…

5 days ago

Why I Treat Talent Like A Dynamic Asset, Not A Fixed Resource

Freedom Trail Capital co-founder Samyr Laine on the qualities he looks for in founders—from adaptability…

5 days ago

Leadership Lessons From The Football Field: Build Teams, Not Followings

Both on the field and in the C-Suite, success hinges on work ethic and a…

5 days ago

A CEO’s Guide To Sustaining Change Over Time

Resistance doesn’t end after kickoff—it evolves. To lead lasting transformation, CEOs must stop treating pushback…

5 days ago