Thousands of Potential New Regulations Have CEOs Concerned

In fact, when CEOs in the latest quarterly survey by The Business Roundtable were asked to identify the two most significant factors holding back increased U.S. investment spending, “regulatory issues” was the second-most mentioned impediment, with 46% of business chiefs (given two choices each) fingering that problem, while 63% were concerned about “U.S. tax policy.” In third place was “weak global demand,” mentioned by 38%.

“46% of business chiefs feel ‘regulatory issues’ is the number one challenge holding back their investment spending.”

In its latest semi-annual “unified” regulatory agenda filed right before Thanksgiving, the Obama administration included some 3,415 new or revised regulations—more than in the last agenda, including 189 rules whose implementation will each cost businesses more than $100 million.

They include a rule that is likely to be one of the most fought-over next year: the agency’s redefinition of “navigable” and “adjacent” waters covered under the Clean Water Act. The new submitted definition includes any piece of property connected to lands of the United States that has water overflow at any point of the year. That includes seasonal streams, ponds, ditches, depressions in fields and even large puddles.

The EPA says it only seeks to smooth out jurisdictional uncertainties in the wake of two recent Supreme Court rulings. But many CEOs and other business opponents see yet another aggressive attempt at government expansion that would prevent many companies and other landowners from excavating or filling in land without a permit that would have to be gained through an extremely long process.

“Besides the power grab, there’s the issue of real uncertainty whether the features of your land would make it considered navigable or adjacent waters, and that can create huge difficulties if you want to sell it,” Dan Bosch, manager of regulatory policy for the National Federation of Independent Businesses, told CEO Briefing.

Even CEOs of high-tech companies are expressing alarm at some likely new attempts at regulatory extension. The Federal Aviation Administration is expected to propose rules for commercial drones next month that would mandate operators to have pilot licenses and limit drone flights to daytime hours, below 400 feet and within sight of the person at the controls, The Wall Street Journal reported.

This might crimp Amazon, Google and other companies experimenting with drones by increasing the costs and eroding the value of operating drones, particularly small ones, and effectively prohibit some commercial applications such as pipeline inspections, large-scale crop monitoring, and e-commerce deliveries, the newspaper said.


Dale Buss

Dale Buss is a long-time contributor to Chief Executive, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and other business publications. He lives in Michigan.

Share
Published by
Dale Buss

Recent Posts

How To Reconfigure A Traditional Industrial Giant For New Era

Johnson Controls CEO Oliver has led a corporate transformation focused on making buildings greener.

14 hours ago

Rachel Barger, Cisco’s Senior Vice President of the Americas, Encourages Us to Always Keep an Open Door

In this edition of our Corporate Competitor Podcast, leadership speaker and storytelling expert Don Yaeger…

3 days ago

Boards May Need To Reevaluate Their Idea Of Acceptable Risk

Boards are being held to a higher standard regarding risk. A more thorough strategy may…

7 days ago

CEOs Can Become Afflicted With ‘Boreout’ Too

If you're experiencing burnout not because you're overworked, but because you're underinspired, it might be…

7 days ago

Why CIOs Should Report Directly To The CEO

When companies elevate the role, they reap significant benefits. Here are five critical ways it…

1 week ago

New-Era Koppers Keeps Staying Ahead Of The Game

CEO Ball has led early decoupling from China and diversification that ties into today’s infrastructure…

1 week ago