A recent survey suggests that sitting CEOs may actually be less effective directors than non-CEOs, citing the responses of 79 percent of directors who said sitting CEOs were no more effective in the role than non-CEOs. The summary of the 2011 Corporate Board of Directors Survey also noted that 55 percent of respondents felt that retired CEOs are actually more effective than active CEOs at board services, and suggested that active CEOs simply haven’t got the time to do the director job well.
But take a hard look at the numbers behind that sweeping conclusion before you rethink your board seats. Just 15 percent of survey respondents were current CEOs, meaning that 85 percent were non-CEOs—and perhaps somewhat unlikely to describe themselves as less qualified than a CEO board member.
What’s more, when asked what traits make active CEOs attractive board candidates, most respondents cited several qualities, including strategic expertise (77 percent), operational expertise (74 percent) and leadership qualities (67 percent).
The bottom line? Sure, CEOs are pressed for time, but they’re also uniquely qualified and motivated to deliver value. And the benefits they bring to the director role—from experience responding to a crisis to extensive personal and professional networks—are invaluable.
In this edition of our Corporate Competitor Podcast, leadership speaker and storytelling expert Don Yaeger…
Boards are being held to a higher standard regarding risk. A more thorough strategy may…
If you're experiencing burnout not because you're overworked, but because you're underinspired, it might be…
When companies elevate the role, they reap significant benefits. Here are five critical ways it…
CEO Ball has led early decoupling from China and diversification that ties into today’s infrastructure…
You can’t be bulletproof, but you can be armed for battle.